The Role of Endocannabinoids System in Fatty Liver Disease and Therapeutic Potentials
Address for correspondence: Dr. Khalid A. Alswat, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Liver Disease Research Center, King Saud University, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected]
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of liver morbidity and mortality with no proven effective therapy as of yet. Its prevalence is increasing globally in parallel with obesity and metabolic syndrome pandemic. The endocannabinoid (EC) system has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including fatty liver diseases. This system refers to the cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2), with both their endogenous ligands and machinery dedicated to EC synthesis and degradation. There is accumulating evidence on the role CB1 as a key mediator of insulin resistance and liver lipogenesis in both animals and humans. On the other hand, CB2 receptors have been shown to promote inflammation with anti-fibrogenic properties. The pharmacological modulation of the EC system activity for the treatment of metabolic syndrome and NAFLD are promising yet premature. The initial limited success due to deleterious central nervous system side-effects are likely to be bypassed with the use of peripherally restricted drugs.
Keywords: Cannabinoid receptors type 1, cannabinoid receptors type 2, endocannabinoids, endocannabinoids system, fatty liver disease
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of liver morbidity and mortality. Its prevalence varies widely depending on the population studied and the definition used.[1,2] The prevalence of histologically-defined NAFLD has been reported to a range from 20% to 51%.[3,4] However, the reported prevalence of NAFLD when defined by liver ultrasound ranged from 17% to 46%, again, depending on the population studied. In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of NAFLD is estimated to be around 16.6%. NAFLD is as a spectrum of disease ranging from simple steatosis to inflammatory non-alcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH) with varying degrees of fibrosis. The latter stage is associated with an activation of fibrogenic pathways and carries a 10-20% risk of cirrhosis after 10-20 years. As shown in different studies, NASH is associated with increased liver-related mortality due to end-stage liver disease and/or development of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Mechanisms of steatosis are related to: (a) increased de novo fatty acid synthesis; (b) increased transport of fatty acids from the peripheral organs to the liver; (c) decreased fatty acid oxidation; and (d) impaired transport of fatty acids (triglycerides (TGs)) from the liver to the circulation and peripheral organs. The detailed pathways of liver steatosis pathogenesis are beyond the scope of this review.
Management of NAFLD remains a major challenge as no treatment has been approved yet for this indication. Most of the current therapeutic strategies aim to decrease insulin resistance as well as the processes leading to necroinflammation and hepatic fibrosis. In this context, modulation of cannabinoid receptors is emerging as a potential novel therapeutic approach. These receptors are part of a novel signaling pathway, known as the endocannabinoid (EC) system that is increasingly incriminated in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions.
The in vitro and in vivo studies reported efficacies of cannabis extracts and its individual compounds in a variety of conditions such as; analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-emetic, anxiolytic, anti-psychotic, and anti-cancer.
Regarding liver disease, accumulating evidence indicates that the cannabinoid system plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of many liver diseases, both as a key player in hepatic injury and as a mediator of complications of cirrhosis. The present review will focus on the role of ECs on fatty liver disease.
The cannabinoid system refers to the cannabinoids, cannabinoid receptors, and machinery dedicated to EC synthesis and degradation. Cannabinoids are a class of diverse chemical compounds that activate cannabinoid receptors, including phytocannabinoids (found in cannabis and some other plants), the ECs (produced naturally in the body by humans and animals), and synthetic cannabinoids (produced chemically by humans). The famous plant “Cannabis sativa L” is a unique source of at least 66 cannabinoids. These plant-derived cannabinoids have long been used for recreational and therapeutic purposes. The principal psychoactive constituent (or cannabinoid) of the cannabis plant is tetra-hydro-cannabinol (THC). This compound was first isolated, identified and synthesized in 1964. Its discovery subsequently led to the identification of cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous legends’ ECs. A number of therapeutic actions of these compounds have been reported and thought to be mediated via EC system. Unfortunately, THC-based drugs produce both therapeutic and undesirable psychotropic actions by activating cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1) in the central nervous system (CNS). Interestingly, some other components such as cannabidiol (CBD) are devoid of the typical psychological effects. CBD constitutes up to 40% of cannabis extracts with some pharmacological effects without the undesirable psychoactive side effects.
EC receptors are G-protein-coupled receptors that react to a variety of cannabinoid (exogenous and endogenous) ligands. The first cannabinoid receptor (CB1) has been isolated and subsequently cloned almost three decades after the discovery of the active component of the plant Cannabis sativa (THC). Consequently, cannabinoid receptors type 2 (CB2) receptor was identified and isolated.[24,25]
Both CB1 and CB2 receptors share low (44%) sequence homology and a similar ligand binding profile. CB1 receptors are located throughout the body, with the highest density expressed in the CNS “forebrain, thalamus, and basal ganglia.” This distribution correlates with known clinical and psychological effects of cannabinoids. Peripherally, CB1 receptors are localized in most internal organs and glands.[26,27] CB2 receptors on the other hand are primarily expressed in the cells of the immune system in the periphery, although they were recently detected in the brain, especially during inflammatory conditions.[27,28] Table 1 showed a comparison between both types of receptors and their role in fatty liver disease.
Comparison between CB1 and CB2 receptors
The cloning of the CB1 receptor was followed by the discovery that mammalian tissues can synthesize ECs and release them on cannabinoid receptors. ECs are endogenous arachidonic acid-derived mediators synthesized from membrane phospholipids “on demand,” and are released from cells immediately after production to activate the cannabinoid receptor to elicit a biological response, after which they are inactivated through reuptake. The first of ECs was identified in 1992, and designated as 2-arachidonoylethanolamine (Anandamide), followed by 2-arachidonyl-glycerol (2-AG). Several other ligands with cannabinoid receptor binding activity were reported since then, e.g., noladine and virodhamine (O-arachidonoyl ethanolamine). Among these, the anandamide and 2-AG are best studied. Biological functions however of most of the other compounds remain largely unknown. Anandamide shows higher affinity for CB1 over CB2 and also binds the vanilloid VR1 receptors, whereas 2-AG binds both CB1 and CB2 receptors with similar affinity. Both anandamide and 2-AG are generated on demand via phospholipid-dependent distinct pathways in response to a rise in intracellular calcium or metabotropic receptor activation. Once released, they remain largely membrane-associated because of their hydrophobic nature. Clearance of ECs relies on cellular uptake and enzymatic degradation (for anandamide through membrane-associated fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) while 2-AG by monoacyglycerol lipase).
Hepatic endocannabinoids system
In the normal liver, the expression of CB1 and CB2 receptors is modest, which probably explains why the focus of research on the role of ECs in the liver pathophysiology has come only recently. Indeed, early studies of brain CB1 receptors used the liver as a negative control. However, during liver pathology, endocanabinoid system is activated, and CB1 and CB2 receptors undergo marked up-regulation in the cirrhotic liver, most particularly in stellate cells, and hepatic vascular endothelial cells[34,35] as well in monocytes (R-33).[36,37]
THE ROLE OF ENDOCANNABINOIDS IN FATTY LIVER DISEASE
Endocannabinoids role in maintaining body weight and energy homeostasis
Maintenance of body weight and energy homeostasis involves the coordinated regulation of appetitive behavior and peripheral energy metabolism. Historically, the well-known craving side-effect of smoking marijuana particularly for sweets and palatable foods, are well- documented in the literature. This has led to the investigation of the possible role of ECs in the control of food intake and body weight.
The orexigenic effect of ECs is regulated through complex central and peripheral mechanisms. Centrally, multiple hypothalamic circuits are connected to the different areas of the brain such as the brainstem (which detects and responds to hunger and satiety signals through sensory and vagal fibers) and the brain reward system, mainly the mesolimbic pathway (which modulates the motivation to obtain food). This effect is regulated through the activation of CB1 receptors in these areas, in addition to the interaction with other hormones, such as leptin, insulin, and ghrelin. Experiments in laboratory animals revealed that THC, as well as the ECs anandamide and 2-AG increased food intake when administered orally, subcutaneously, or centrally and antagonized by CB1 blockade.[41,42]
Central and peripheral effects of endocannabinoids in obesity and liver steatosis
Several observations suggested that reduction of food intake alone cannot fully explain anti-obesity effects of CB1 antagonists. Investigators showed that CB1 knockout mice (CB1 -/- ) are lean with resistance to diet-induced obesity (DIO) even though their total caloric intake is similar to that of wild-type littermates, which became obese on the same diet. This finding has been supported by other experiments, where treatment of DIO mice with Rimonabant, a CB1 antagonist induced a transient reduction of food intake on week 1 and a marked, but sustained reduction of body weight and adiposity of these animals. Furthermore, CB1 -/- mice display only a temporary hypophagia in the first few weeks of life but maintained a lean phenotype throughout adulthood. These observations concluded that EC system affects energy balance, weight changes, and steatosis via central orexigenic drive and peripheral metabolic effects.
The mechanism underlying these effects was demonstrated in animal experiments which showed that hepatocytes express CB1, stimulation of which induces the expression of the lipogenic transcription factor sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1c and its target enzymes: Acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase-1 and fatty acid synthase (FAS) as well as increased de novo fatty acid synthesis. The same molecular target for CB1 has been demonstrated in the hypothalamus, where inhibitors of FAS have been reported to cause anorexia.[46,47] Thus, the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway likely represents a common pathway for the central and peripheral effects of ECs.
ROLE OF CB1 RECEPTORS IN FATTY LIVER DISEASE: (EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE)
Role of CB1 receptors in high fat diet-induced fatty liver
Animal studies showed that high-fat diet increases hepatic levels of anandamide, CB1 density, and basal rates of fatty acid synthesis, and the latter is reduced by CB1 blockade. In DIO mice model, treatment with rimonabant reduced fat mass, insulin levels, and liver TGs. The expression of CB1, which was strongly increased in the liver and adipose tissue of high-sucrose high-fat mice, was totally normalized by the treatment. Furthermore, treatment with a CB1 agonist also increases de novo fatty acid synthesis in the liver or in isolated hepatocytes, which express CB1. These studies support clearly the role of CB1 receptors in fatty acid synthesis and DIO and fatty liver. In order to determine the exact target tissue for these effects, Ossei et al., examined the effect of high fat diet on three groups of mice: Wild type, global CB1 receptor deficient mice CB1 (CB1 -/- ) and liver-specific CB1 knockout (LCB1 -/- ) mice. They observed that LCB1 -/- mice are susceptible to DIO similar to wild type, but unlike (CB1 -/- ); however, they are resistant to diet-induced steatosis, changes in plasma lipid, leptin and insulin levels. Furthermore, they found CB1 receptor agonist (HU-210) increased hepatic de novo lipogenesis in wild-type chow-fed mice, but not in (CB1 -/- ) or LCB1 -/- . This experiment supported the contention that high-fat diet induces fatty liver primarily via activation of hepatic CB1 receptors, and these receptors are required for the development of diet-induced steatosis, dyslipidemia, and insulin and leptin resistance. Overall, these findings strongly support role for hepatic CB1 receptors in diet-induced liver steatosis, and associated hormonal and metabolic changes.
Role of CB1 receptors in obesity-associated fatty liver
Gary-Bobo et al., investigated the role of CB1 receptors in the development of fatty liver in Zucker rats (genetically obese with defective leptin receptors and have severe hepatic steatosis), and showed that rimonabant reduces obesity-associated hepatic steatosis, features of metabolic syndrome including reduction of elevated liver enzymes, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and increased the anti-inflammatory hormone adiponectin. Furthermore, liver slices from the obese (fa/fa) rats treated with rimonabant were found to be histologically comparable to those from lean rats. In contrast, in pair-fed rats, which consumed the same amount of food as that of rimonabant-treated rats, steatosis, and hepatomegaly were not significantly reduced. This suggests that Rimonabant, and not reduced food intake, was responsible for reducing steatosis. Taken together, these results indicate that in the obese rats, development of fatty liver is mediated via activation of CB1 receptors.
Role of CB1 receptors in alcoholic fatty liver
Chronic alcohol use is a major cause of liver steatosis. Similar to diet induced liver steatosis, alcohol induced steatosis is associated with enhanced hepatic lipogenesis and deceased fatty acid oxidation.
Jeong et al., has shown that mice fed with ethanol developed marked hepatic expression of CB1 receptors and high levels of 2-AG and its biosynthetic enzymes selectively in hepatic stellate cells. Concurrent administration of CB1 receptor blocker Rimonabant resulted in attenuation of steatosis in mice chronically fed with ethanol diet. Consistent with Rimonabant effect, mice with global or hepatocyte-specific CB1 receptor knockout were resistant to ethanol-induced steatosis. These findings suggest that ethanol induces fatty liver via hepatocyte CB1 receptor activation. The mechanism underlying this CB1 mediated steatogeneis is likely related to enhanced paracrine effect of 2-AG produced by hepatic stellate cells. This is supported by the finding that in controls co-culture with stellate cells from ethanol-fed mice resulted in up-regulation of CB1 receptors and lipogenic gene expression. From these experiments, paracrine activation of hepatic CB1 receptors by stellate cell-derived ECs 2-AG mediates alcoholic fatty liver. Collectively, these data support the concept that activation of CB1 receptors promotes liver steatosis associated with high fat diet, obesity and alcohol in addition to other metabolic effects such as insulin resistance and that targeting of CB1 may be an efficient therapeutic strategy for the management of NAFLD.
ROLE OF CB1 RECEPTORS IN FATTY LIVER DISEASE: (CLINICAL EVIDENCE)
Dysregulated endocannabinoids system in subjects with obesity
Enhanced EC tone has been reported in obese patients prone to develop fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome. In several studies, obese individuals displayed higher serum levels of ECs than lean individuals. There was a strong association between high plasma EC levels and visceral obesity, high TGs, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and insulin resistance in obese as well as type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.[53,54,55,56] In a study of 60 non-diabetic Caucasian patients who underwent open abdominal surgery, circulating 2-AG, and not anandamide, was significantly correlated with body fat (r = 0.45, P = 0.03), visceral fat mass (r = 0.44, P = 0.003), and fasting plasma insulin concentrations (r = 0.41, P = 0.001) in obese subjects compared with lean subjects.
In another study involving 62 untreated asymptomatic men with varying body mass index (BMI), plasma concentrations of 2-AG levels correlated positively with BMI, waist girth, intra-abdominal adiposity (IAA), fasting plasma TG and insulin levels, and negatively with HDL cholesterol and adiponectin levels. Furthermore, obese men with similar BMI values and who markedly differed in their amount of IAA exhibited higher 2-AG levels in the presence of high IAA. However, no difference in 2-AG concentrations was observed between obese men with low levels of IAA versus non-obese controls.
Effects of exercise on ECs level were assessed in 49 viscerally obese men (average age 49 years, BMI 30.9 kg/m 2 , waist 107.3 cm) who underwent a 1 year lifestyle modification program. Plasma levels of 2-AG and anandamide were measured in addition to the anthropometric and metabolic risk factors. Most risk factors were improved by the intervention, which led to a significant decrease in body weight (− 6.4 kg, P < 0.0001), waist circumference (− 8.0 cm, P < 0.0001) Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) (− 30%, P < 0.0001), plasma 2-AG (− 62.3%, P < 0.0001) and anandamide (− 7.1%, P = 0.005) levels. In this study, the decreased levels of 2-AG correlated with decreases in VAT and TG levels, and with the increase in HDL-cholesterol levels. Multivariate analysis suggested that decreases in 2-AG and VAT were both independently associated with decreases in TGs.
Dysregulated endocannabinoids system in subjects with liver steatosis
The relationship between splanchnic EC levels and liver steatosis has been analyzed in a recent study. A total of 9 subjects with various degrees of hepatic steatosis underwent hepatic venous catheterization in combination with infusion of ( 2 H2) palmitate in the fasting state and during a low-dose insulin infusion. There was a positive correlation between liver fat content and splanchnic free fatty acids (FFA) extraction during hyperinsulinemia, with a concomitant increase in the arterial and hepatic venous concentrations of 2-AG. This indicates that the human fatty liver takes up 2-AG and overproduces triacylglycerols containing saturated fatty acids, which might reflect increased de novo lipogenesis.
Another support of the steatogenic role of ECs in humans is that exogenous phytocannabinoids affects the severity of steatosis. In a prospective study of 315 untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C, daily cannabis smoking over the 6 month period preceding biopsy was identified as an independent predictor of severe steatosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-4.5). Interestingly, in another cohort of 88 patients with chronic hepatitis C, hepatic CB1 expression correlated with the extent of steatosis and was significantly up-regulated in those with increased steatosis grade, suggesting CB1 receptor activation and signaling. This association was highly significant for genotype 3, but not 1. Moreover, in genotype 3 patients, CB1 expression correlated strongly with the lipogenic transcription factor SREBP-1c and its downstream target FAS, a finding not observed in genotype one patients.
Clinical trials on endocannabinoids and fatty liver
Interventions through modulation of EC pathways have been conducted, the most famous drug is Rimonabant (Acomplia-Sanofi-Aventis), which was the first selective CB1 antagonist introduced into clinical practice. The efficacy and safety of Rimonabant in weight reduction and improving metabolic syndrome parameters in different populations have been assessed in several trials. The four large ‘Rimonabant in obesity’ (RIO) studies involved over 6600 participants, composed of four separate trials: RIO North America, RIO Europe, RIO Diabetes and RIO Lipids, in addition to other randomized double-blind Rimonabant-placebo controlled trials, namely the Serenade, Stradivarius, Arpeggio and Adagio-lipids studies.
In all these trials, there was a clear benefit of Rimonabant on weight reduction, abdominal obesity, liver steatosis and improvement of other cardiometaboilc syndrome parameters, including improved insulin sensitivity, elevated plasma adiponectin and HDL cholesterol, and reduced plasma TG and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels., Interestingly, the most worrying adverse event of this drug was the increased incidence of psychiatric disorders: depression, anxiety, irritability, and aggression. According to a meta-analysis of randomized trials, Rimonabant caused significantly more adverse events than did placebo (OR = 1.4; P = 0.0007; number needed to harm = 25 individuals [95% CI 17-58]), and 1.4 times more serious adverse events (OR = 1.4; P = 0.03; number needed to harm = 59 (27-830)). Furthermore, two suicide deaths were reported in patients taking this drug. In the US Food and Drug Administration analysis of the four major trials as well as unpublished trials, psychiatric adverse events were found to be more common with Rimonabant (20 mg/day) than placebo Rimonabant. The drug was never approved in the United States for the treatment of obesity. Consequently, the marketing approval for Rimonabant has since been removed by the European Regulatory Authorities.
ROLE OF CB2 RECEPTORS IN FATTY LIVER DISEASE
As mentioned earlier, the role of CB2 receptors has been recognized in the last few years as a critical modulator of inflammation, pain, bone loss and in liver pathophysiology, especially liver inflammation and fibrogenesis associated with chronic liver diseases, ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced liver injury, and hepatic encephalopathy-associated with acute liver failure.[71,72,73]
Role of CB2 receptors in the development of fatty liver
In contrast to CB1 receptors, the role of CB2 receptors in the development of fatty liver is under-investigated. Normal adult liver shows weak expression of CB2 receptors, which is up-regulated in pathological conditions.
Animal studies have shown that CB2 receptor expression undergoes a strong induction in adipose tissue that correlated with increased fat inflammation, and a moderate induction in the liver of ob/ob mice (genetically leptin-deficient mice) and mice fed a high fat diet. This expression arises mainly from the macrophage-enriched stromal vascular fraction of the adipose tissue and the non-parenchymal liver cells. The potential role of CB2 in the pathogenesis of fatty liver has been supported by the finding that the administration of JWH-133(CB2 agonist) enhanced liver TG accumulation, insulin resistance and potentiated fat inflammation in wild-type mice fed with a high-fat diet for 6 weeks. In contrast, genetic or pharmacological inactivation of CB2 receptors decreased adipose tissue macrophage infiltration, protected mice from both age-related and diet-induced insulin resistance. In human studies, CB2 receptors are expressed in all liver samples from patients with steatosis and steatohepatitis. Specifically, receptors were localized in hepatic stellate cells, hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. In contrast, biopsies from normal liver showed neither parenchymal nor non-parenchymal cells CB2 expression. Taken together, it is likely that CB2 receptors have a potential role on liver steatogenesis and fat inflammatory response associated with insulin resistance.
Role of CB2 receptors in fibrogenesis
The role of CB2 receptors in fibrogenesis has not been well-characterized. However, there is some evidence of a potential anti-fibrogenic role of CB2 activation. Interestingly, CB2 has been proposed to have anti-fibrogenic properties while CB1 has been proposed as a pro-fibrogenic activator.[71,77] Selective activation of hepatic CB2 receptors significantly reduced hepatic collagen content in rats with pre-existing cirrhosis and enhanced regenerative response to acute liver injury. In line with this observation, treatment with CB2 agonist, JWH-133, reduced the injury and accelerated liver regeneration. In contrast, CB2 -/- mice had enhanced response to fibrogenic stimuli and delayed liver regeneration in response to carbon tetrachloride 14CCl4-induced injury. In liver biopsy specimens from patients with active cirrhosis of various etiologies, CB2 receptors are highly up-regulated in the cirrhotic liver, predominantly in hepatic fibrogenic cells. In contrast, CB2 receptors were not detected in normal human liver. Furthermore, they were also detected in cultured hepatic myofibroblasts and in activated hepatic stellate cells.
These data support the potential anti-fibrotic role of CB2 receptors and signal the therapeutic potential of non-psychoactive CB2 agonists in the treatment of liver fibrosis.
CONCLUSIONS – FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
There are overwhelming experimental and clinical data supporting a major role of ECs in the pathogenesis of liver steatosis and other features of chronic liver disease, with potential therapeutic interventions. Tempering these promises, concern for psychiatric safety of EC pathway interventions has unfortunately put an end to the clinical development of some antagonists/inverse agonists that enter the brain. Nevertheless, considering the meaningful clinical benefits expected from therapeutic developments in this line in liver diseases and other fields, research efforts are ongoing in several diseases with significant success.
The use of peripherally restricted compounds with CB1 antagonist properties and limited brain penetration, such as CBD is promising.
A phase-1 pharmacokinetic study of potent and selective CB1 antagonist (cp-945598) in patients with NASH is ongoing. Another phase-2 study to assess the effect of CBD on liver fat levels in subjects with fatty liver disease has been completed and waiting the results. Another phase-2 study to assess two cannabinoids GW 42004 and GW42003 alone, or in combination in patients with type 2 diabetes is completed, reports due soon. These hopes are in line with previously reported significant results in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy and spasticity of multiple sclerosis with the use of nabiximols (Sativex) with a principal active cannabinoid components (THC and CBD). Sativex is the first cannabis-based medicine to be licensed in the UK for multiple sclerosis and it has approval in many European countries, as well as in Canada.[83,84]
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
1. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116 :1413–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: The epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34 :274–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Lee JY, Kim KM, Lee SG, Yu E, Lim YS, Lee HC, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in potential living liver donors in Korea: A review of 589 consecutive liver biopsies in a single center. J Hepatol. 2007; 47 :239–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Marcos A, Fisher RA, Ham JM, Olzinski AT, Shiffman ML, Sanyal AJ, et al. Selection and outcome of living donors for adult to adult right lobe transplantation. Transplantation. 2000; 69 :2410–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Al-hamoudi W, El-Sabbah M, Ali S, Altuwaijri M, Bedewi M, Adam M, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of Saudi patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A hospital-based study. Ann Saudi Med. 2012; 32 :288–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Ong JP, Younossi ZM. Epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD and NASH. Clin Liver Dis. 2007; 11 :1–16. vii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Ratziu V, Poynard T. Assessing the outcome of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis? It’s time to get serious. Hepatology. 2006; 44 :802–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Purohit V, Rapaka R, Shurtleff D. Role of cannabinoids in the development of fatty liver (steatosis) AAPS J. 2010; 12 :233–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Mallat A, Lotersztajn S. Endocannabinoids and their role in fatty liver disease. Dig Dis. 2010; 28 :261–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Pertwee RG. Cannabinoid receptors and pain. Prog Neurobiol. 2001; 63 :569–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Costa B, Colleoni M, Conti S, Parolaro D, Franke C, Trovato AE, et al. Oral anti-inflammatory activity of cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive constituent of cannabis, in acute carrageenan-induced inflammation in the rat paw. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2004; 369 :294–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Mechoulam R, Parker LA, Gallily R. Cannabidiol: An overview of some pharmacological aspects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 42 (11 Suppl 1):11S–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Crippa JA, Zuardi AW, Garrido GE, Wichert-Ana L, Guarnieri R, Ferrari L, et al. Effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on regional cerebral blood flow. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004; 29 :417–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Leweke FM, Piomelli D, Pahlisch F, Muhl D, Gerth CW, Hoyer C, Klosterkotter J, Hellmich M, Koethe D. Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl Pshychiatry. 2012; 2 :e94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Guzmán M. Cannabinoids: Potential anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3 :74555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Mallat A, Lotersztajn S. Endocannabinoids and liver disease. I. Endocannabinoids and their receptors in the liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008; 294 :G9–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Mallat A, Teixeira-Clerc F, Deveaux V, Lotersztajn S. Cannabinoid receptors as new targets of antifibrosing strategies during chronic liver diseases. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2007; 11 :403–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Pacher P, Bátkai S, Kunos G. The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol Rev. 2006; 58 :389–462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Pertwee RG. Cannabinoid pharmacology: The first 66 years. Br J Pharmacol. 2006; 147 (Suppl 1):S163–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Gaoni Y, Mechoulam R. Isolation, structure and partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish. J Am Chem Soc. 1964; 86 :1646. [Google Scholar]
21. Mechoulam R, Peters M, Murillo-Rodriguez E, Hanus LO. Cannabidiol: Recent advances. Chem Biodivers. 2007; 4 :1678–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Howlett AC, Barth F, Bonner TI, Cabral G, Casellas P, Devane WA, et al. International union of pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2002; 54 :161–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Devane WA, Dysarz FA, 3rd, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Howlett AC. Determination and characterization of a cannabinoid receptor in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol. 1988; 34 :605–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Matsuda LA, Lolait SJ, Brownstein MJ, Young AC, Bonner TI. Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature. 1990; 346 :5614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Van Sickle MD, Duncan M, Kingsley PJ, Mouihate A, Urbani P, Mackie K, et al. Identification and functional characterization of brainstem cannabinoid CB2 receptors. Science. 2005; 310 :329–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Mackie K. Cannabinoid receptors: Where they are and what they do. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008; 20 (Suppl 1):10–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Pertwee RG. Pharmacology of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 74 :129–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Shoemaker JL, Seely KA, Reed RL, Crow JP, Prather PL. The CB2 cannabinoid agonist AM-1241 prolongs survival in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis when initiated at symptom onset. J Neurochem. 2007; 101 :87–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, et al. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science. 1992; 258 :1946–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Gabbay E, Avraham Y, Ilan Y, Israeli E, Berry EM. Endocannabinoids and liver disease: Review. Liver Int. 2005; 25 :921–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. McKinney MK, Cravatt BF. Structure and function of fatty acid amide hydrolase. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005; 74 :411–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Dinh TP, Carpenter D, Leslie FM, Freund TF, Katona I, Sensi SL, et al. Brain monoglyceride lipase participating in endocannabinoid inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99 :10819–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Galiègue S, Mary S, Marchand J, Dussossoy D, Carrière D, Carayon P, et al. Expression of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations. Eur J Biochem. 1995; 232 :54–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Jeong WI, Osei-Hyiaman D, Park O, Liu J, Bátkai S, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. Paracrine activation of hepatic CB1 receptors by stellate cell-derived endocannabinoids mediates alcoholic fatty liver. Cell Metab. 2008; 7 :227–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Moezi L, Gaskari SA, Liu H, Baik SK, Dehpour AR, Lee SS. Anandamide mediates hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhotic rats via CB (1) and VR (1) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2006; 149 :898–908. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Bátkai S, Járai Z, Wagner JA, Goparaju SK, Varga K, Liu J, et al. Endocannabinoids acting at vascular CB1 receptors mediate the vasodilated state in advanced liver cirrhosis. Nat Med. 2001; 7 :827–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Ros J, Clària J, To-Figueras J, Planagumà A, Cejudo-Martín P, Fernández-Varo G, et al. Endogenous cannabinoids: A new system involved in the homeostasis of arterial pressure in experimental cirrhosis in the rat. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122 :85–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Cota D. CB1 receptors: Emerging evidence for central and peripheral mechanisms that regulate energy balance, metabolism, and cardiovascular health. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007; 23 :507–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Marco EM, Romero-Zerbo SY, Viveros MP, Bermudez-Silva FJ. The role of the endocannabinoid system in eating disorders: Pharmacological implications. Behav Pharmacol. 2012; 23 :526–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Bermudez-Silva FJ, Cardinal P, Cota D. The role of the endocannabinoid system in the neuroendocrine regulation of energy balance. J Psychopharmacol. 2012; 26 :114–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Kirkham TC, Williams CM, Fezza F, Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoid levels in rat limbic forebrain and hypothalamus in relation to fasting, feeding and satiation: Stimulation of eating by 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. Br J Pharmacol. 2002; 136 :550–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Ravinet Trillou C, Delgorge C, Menet C, Arnone M, Soubrié P. CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout in mice leads to leanness, resistance to diet-induced obesity and enhanced leptin sensitivity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004; 28 :640–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Ravinet Trillou C, Arnone M, Delgorge C, Gonalons N, Keane P, Maffrand JP, et al. Anti-obesity effect of SR141716, a CB1 receptor antagonist, in diet-induced obese mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 284 :R345–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Cota D, Marsicano G, Tschöp M, Grübler Y, Flachskamm C, Schubert M, et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system affects energy balance via central orexigenic drive and peripheral lipogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112 :423–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs): Controllers of lipid synthesis and cellular uptake. Nutr Rev. 1998; 56 :S1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Loftus TM, Jaworsky DE, Frehywot GL, Townsend CA, Ronnett GV, Lane MD, et al. Reduced food intake and body weight in mice treated with fatty acid synthase inhibitors. Science. 2000; 288 :2379–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Kim EK, Miller I, Landree LE, Borisy-Rudin FF, Brown P, Tihan T, et al. Expression of FAS within hypothalamic neurons: A model for decreased food intake after C75 treatment. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 283 :E867–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Osei-Hyiaman D, DePetrillo M, Pacher P, Liu J, Radaeva S, Bátkai S, et al. Endocannabinoid activation at hepatic CB1 receptors stimulates fatty acid synthesis and contributes to diet-induced obesity. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115 :1298–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Jourdan T, Djaouti L, Demizieux L, Gresti J, Vergès B, Degrace P. CB1 antagonism exerts specific molecular effects on visceral and subcutaneous fat and reverses liver steatosis in diet-induced obese mice. Diabetes. 2010; 59 :926–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Osei-Hyiaman D, Liu J, Zhou L, Godlewski G, Harvey-White J, Jeong WI, et al. Hepatic CB1 receptor is required for development of diet-induced steatosis, dyslipidemia, and insulin and leptin resistance in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008; 118 :3160–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Gary-Bobo M, Elachouri G, Gallas JF, Janiak P, Marini P, Ravinet-Trillou C, et al. Rimonabant reduces obesity-associated hepatic steatosis and features of metabolic syndrome in obese Zucker fa/fa rats. Hepatology. 2007; 46 :122–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. You M, Fischer M, Deeg MA, Crabb DW. Ethanol induces fatty acid synthesis pathways by activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) J Biol Chem. 2002; 277 :29342–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Blüher M, Engeli S, Klöting N, Berndt J, Fasshauer M, Bátkai S, et al. Dysregulation of the peripheral and adipose tissue endocannabinoid system in human abdominal obesity. Diabetes. 2006; 55 :3053–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Côté M, Matias I, Lemieux I, Petrosino S, Alméras N, Després JP, et al. Circulating endocannabinoid levels, abdominal adiposity and related cardiometabolic risk factors in obese men. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007; 31 :692–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Di Marzo V, Côté M, Matias I, Lemieux I, Arsenault BJ, Cartier A, et al. Changes in plasma endocannabinoid levels in viscerally obese men following a 1 year lifestyle modification programme and waist circumference reduction: Associations with changes in metabolic risk factors. Diabetologia. 2009; 52 :213–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Matias I, Gonthier MP, Orlando P, Martiadis V, De Petrocellis L, Cervino C, et al. Regulation, function, and dysregulation of endocannabinoids in models of adipose and beta-pancreatic cells and in obesity and hyperglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91 :3171–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Westerbacka J, Kotronen A, Fielding BA, Wahren J, Hodson L, Perttilä J, et al. Splanchnic balance of free fatty acids, endocannabinoids, and lipids in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139 :1961–1971.e1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Hézode C, Zafrani ES, Roudot-Thoraval F, Costentin C, Hessami A, Bouvier-Alias M, et al. Daily cannabis use: A novel risk factor of steatosis severity in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 :432–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. van der Poorten D, Shahidi M, Tay E, Sesha J, Tran K, McLeod D, et al. Hepatitis C virus induces the cannabinoid receptor 1. PLoS One. 2010; 5 :e12841. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Pi-Sunyer FX, Aronne LJ, Heshmati HM, Devin J, Rosenstock J RIO-North America Study Group. Effect of rimonabant, a cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker, on weight and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight or obese patients: RIO-North America: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006; 295 :761–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Van Gaal LF, Rissanen AM, Scheen AJ, Ziegler O, Rössner S RIO-Europe Study Group. Effects of the cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker rimonabant on weight reduction and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients: 1-year experience from the RIO-Europe study. Lancet. 2005; 365 :1389–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Scheen AJ, Finer N, Hollander P, Jensen MD, Van Gaal LF RIO-Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of rimonabant in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2006; 368 :1660–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Després JP, Golay A, Sjöström L Rimonabant in obesity-lipids study Group. Effects of rimonabant on metabolic risk factors in overweight patients with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353 :2121–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Rosenstock J, Iranmanesh A, Hollander PA. Improved glycemic control with weight loss plus beneficial effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia with rimonabant in drug-naïve type 2 diabetes: The Serenade trial. Diabetes. 2007; 56 :A49–50. [Google Scholar]
65. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, Rodés-Cabau J, Cannon CP, Deanfield JE, et al. Effect of rimonabant on progression of atherosclerosis in patients with abdominal obesity and coronary artery disease: The STRADIVARIUS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008; 299 :1547–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Hollander PA, Amod A, Litwak LE, Chaudhari U ARPEGGIO Study Group. Effect of rimonabant on glycemic control in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: The ARPEGGIO trial. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33 :605–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Després JP, Ross R, Boka G, Alméras N, Lemieux I ADAGIO-Lipids Investigators. Effect of rimonabant on the high-triglyceride/low-HDL-cholesterol dyslipidemia, intraabdominal adiposity, and liver fat: The ADAGIO-Lipids trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29 :416–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Christopoulou FD, Kiortsis DN. An overview of the metabolic effects of rimonabant in randomized controlled trials: Potential for other cannabinoid 1 receptor blockers in obesity. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011; 36 :10–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Christensen R, Kristensen PK, Bartels EM, Bliddal H, Astrup A. Efficacy and safety of the weight-loss drug rimonabant: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2007; 370 :1706–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Sam AH, Salem V, Ghatei MA. Rimonabant: From RIO to Ban. J Obes. 2011; 2011 :432607. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Julien B, Grenard P, Teixeira-Clerc F, Van Nhieu JT, Li L, Karsak M, et al. Antifibrogenic role of the cannabinoid receptor CB2 in the liver. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128 :742–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Bátkai S, Osei-Hyiaman D, Pan H, El-Assal O, Rajesh M, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. Cannabinoid-2 receptor mediates protection against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2007; 21 :1788–800. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Lotersztajn S, Teixeira-Clerc F, Julien B, Deveaux V, Ichigotani Y, Manin S, et al. CB2 receptors as new therapeutic targets for liver diseases. Br J Pharmacol. 2008; 153 :286–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Deveaux V, Cadoudal T, Ichigotani Y, Teixeira-Clerc F, Louvet A, Manin S, et al. Cannabinoid CB2 receptor potentiates obesity-associated inflammation, insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis. PLoS One. 2009; 4 :e5844. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Agudo J, Martin M, Roca C, Molas M, Bura AS, Zimmer A, et al. Deficiency of CB2 cannabinoid receptor in mice improves insulin sensitivity but increases food intake and obesity with age. Diabetologia. 2010; 53 :2629–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Mendez-Sanchez N, Zamora-Valdes D, Pichardo-Bahena R, Barredo-Prieto B, Ponciano-Rodriguez G, Bermejo-Martínez L, et al. Endocannabinoid receptor CB2 in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2007; 27 :215–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. Teixeira-Clerc F, Julien B, Grenard P, Tran Van Nhieu J, Deveaux V, Li L, et al. CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonism: A new strategy for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Nat Med. 2006; 12 :671–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Muñoz-Luque J, Ros J, Fernández-Varo G, Tugues S, Morales-Ruiz M, Alvarez CE, et al. Regression of fibrosis after chronic stimulation of cannabinoid CB2 receptor in cirrhotic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008; 324 :475–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Teixeira-Clerc F, Belot MP, Manin S, Deveaux V, Cadoudal T, Chobert MN, et al. Beneficial paracrine effects of cannabinoid receptor 2 on liver injury and regeneration. Hepatology. 2010; 52 :1046–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Selvarajah D, Gandhi R, Emery CJ, Tesfaye S. Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial of cannabis-based medicinal product (Sativex) in painful diabetic neuropathy: Depression is a major confounding factor. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33 :128–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Collin C, Ehler E, Waberzinek G, Alsindi Z, Davies P, Powell K, et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of Sativex, in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res. 2010; 32 :451–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology : Official Journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer — Medknow Publications
CBD For Liver Disease (NAFLD & AFLD): What the Research Says
Studies have shown that people who regularly use cannabis have fewer incidences of fatty liver disease.
How does this work?
Can CBD oil support people with liver disease?
Fatty liver disease is a serious, but common medical condition.
Some studies have shown it to be present in about 16% of the population .
It’s a problem that tends to get worse until, eventually, it results in liver failure.
There are currently no known cures for the disease, however, recent evidence has suggested that CBD can be extremely beneficial for the condition.
Here, we investigate these claims, how they may work, and how CBD oil can be used to support fatty liver disease.
MEDICALLY REVIEWED BY
Updated on June 05, 2021
Table of Contents
$49 – $229
Royal CBD Oil 30 mL
5 / 5
|Total CBD:||500 – 2500 mg|
|Potency:||16.6 – 83.3 mg/mL|
|Cost per mg CBD:||$0.12 – $0.18|
The Benefits of CBD Oil For Fatty Liver Disease
CBD oil has indirect benefits for fatty liver disease. Research has shown CBD protects the liver by preventing overreaction of the endocannabinoid system (ECS). When the liver becomes stressed (due to poor diet or exposure to toxic compounds), the endocannabinoid system becomes highly active in the liver.
It’s this activation of the ECS leads to a buildup of fatty acid particles in the liver. CBD may prevent this from happening and may help slow the progression of the disease.
The only way to effectively treat fatty liver disease is through diet and lifestyle modifications. CBD oil can help support the condition, but won’t offer a cure.
The Best CBD Oils For Fatty Liver Disease
Guide to Using CBD Oil For Fatty Liver Disease
In recent years, there’s been a lot of reports that marijuana users suffered less frequently from obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome [3-5], all of which are key drivers of fatty liver disease.
This is even more interesting when these researchers began looking at the diets of cannabis users and non-users.
On average, cannabis users ate more junk foods, soda, and alcohol than non-users , yet still had lower incidences of metabolic disease.
So this had researchers wondering;
“Could marijuana and CBD oil be used to prevent or treat fatty liver disease?”
A large research study analyzed the effects of CBD on 22,366 patients, many of which had active fatty liver disease or earlier stages of metabolic syndrome. Researchers in this study confirmed that the chances of developing fatty liver disease were much lower in those who were active cannabis users, though they were unable to suggest a mechanism for these effects .
Other studies have since been published that shed some light on how this works.
In order to get into the details of how this works, let’s discuss the role of the endocannabinoid system in the liver, and how this plays an important role in fatty liver disease.
What’s The Dose of CBD Oil For Fatty Liver Disease?
Dosing CBD for fatty liver disease is very similar to dosing it for other conditions.
Because the cannabinoids affect everybody so differently, it’s recommended that you always start with a lower dose (around 1 mg per day) and increase gradually from there.
Some people will stay at this 1 mg dose, while others may need substantially more, perhaps around the 30 mg mark,
The best way to find out the dose for you is to take 1 mg, then increase by 4 mg each day.
If side effects are noted (such as drowsiness, nausea, or poor appetite) simply reduce the dose to the last one that produced no side effects and stay there.
Fatty liver disease is a long-term, chronic condition, and will, therefore, need to be taken over a long period of time.
We recommend taking a high-quality CBD oil for 6 or 12 months, with regular follow-ups with your doctor to see any progression.
CBD Oil Dosage Calculator
Embed this map on your site
Copy and paste the code below
What is Fatty Liver Disease?
Fatty liver disease is exactly what it sounds like: fat deposits in the liver.
When this happens, the fat deposits will start to interfere with the liver’s ability to function. If left unchecked, it will eventually lead to much more serious health problems.
There are two types of fatty liver disease:
1. Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is caused by metabolic dysfunctions in the body.
Our liver plays a major role in the regulation of both sugar and fat metabolism.
The liver teams up with the pancreas and adrenal glands to control our blood sugar levels and fat burning or storage.
When we eat too much sugar or refined carbohydrates like chips, white bread, or candy, and don’t exercise enough, our body stops listening to one of the hormones secreted by the pancreas — insulin.
This is the starting point for fatty liver disease.
As soon as insulin stops working, the body no longer uses sugar the way it’s supposed to, causing it to build up to dangerous levels in the blood.
The liver needs to work much harder to stop the build-up of sugar from causing damage to the body. It does this by converting the sugar into stored fat.
When this happens, fat droplets accumulate inside the liver cells themselves.
Over time, these fat droplets will grow and take up more and more space inside the liver.
This causes damage to the liver cells, making them less effective at doing the job they’re meant to do. As the liver cells die, they trigger inflammation in the area, causing the liver to swell and become even less effective.
With long-term inflammation, the liver will begin to fill up with scar tissue, known as fibrosis.
These scars cause permanent changes to the liver, making it ineffective, and eventually leading to more serious symptoms.
NAFLD is driven by poor diet and lack of exercise.
2. Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (AFLD)
Alcoholic fatty liver is caused by long-term alcoholism.
The body can generally tolerate small amounts of alcohol relatively well, however, large amounts are problematic to the body.
There are 3 different ways the liver can metabolize alcohol, the main one being a pathway called alcohol dehydrogenase. There are many steps to this process, but the most important thing to know is that it requires a lot of energy to function.
This energy comes in the form of something called NAD+.
NAD+ can be thought of as a cellular currency for energy.
In order for the liver to get access to enough NAD+ to fuel alcohol metabolism, it needs to build a lot of fat. This is because NAD+ is a byproduct of building fat.
This leads to a buildup of fatty acids in the liver.
Over long periods of time, this fat can build-up to the point where it starts to get in the way, no matter where the liver tries to put it. There is simply too much.
By the time fatty liver disease symptoms show up in an alcoholic, there’s already a great deal of damage done, and it’s very difficult to repair, even with CBD oil.
CBD oil is best used for people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, so this is going to be the main focus of this article.
Diet & Lifestyle Modifications
As you can see, both alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is caused primarily by lifestyle and diet factors.
Diets with too much sugar or refined carbohydrates, poor exercise, and excessive alcohol intake are all key drivers in the condition.
Therefore, anything you take to help the condition is going to come secondary to changing the causes. This means visiting a holistic nutritionist, or dietitian, and working on changing your habits around food and alcohol.
CBD oil can go a long way if used in combination with these changes but will do very little on its own.
The Endocannabinoid System & Fatty Liver Disease
The endocannabinoid system is found in all mammals.
It’s a system of receptors (CB1 and CB2 receptors) and endogenous cannabinoids that are responsible for regulating many of our homeostatic control mechanisms.
In simple English, this means that the endocannabinoid system controls the balance of various systems in the body.
When our organs become damaged, inflamed, or dysfunctional, we find a noticeable increase in the endocannabinoid activity in the area, as it tries to bring us back to normal levels.
In a healthy liver, the endocannabinoid system only has a modest presence. In fact, it doesn’t appear to do much at all in this particular organ.
However, when the liver becomes damaged and inflamed, the endocannabinoid system wakes up and starts to be very active in the area.
Too active, perhaps…
When fatty liver starts and the liver function begins to suffer, the endocannabinoid system steps up to try and make things normal again, unfortunately, it only appears to make things worse, and CB1 and CB2 endocannabinoid receptors play a role in the development of fatty liver disease .
Supporting Liver Function With CBD
This is going to get real confusing, so let me get this out of the way.
CBD is a CB1 and CB2 receptor agonist-antagonist.
What does this mean, you ask?
In this case, it means that CBD stops the compounds that are making the endocannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) in the liver go haywire.
It stops the endocannabinoid system from going crazy, establishing balance to the endocannabinoid system itself.
It’s the equalizer for the system that balances us.
This effectively protects the body from things like fatty liver disease and makes it easier for us to resist and recover from this condition more effectively.
It’s important to note that this action alone isn’t going to prevent fatty liver disease, but will make it more difficult for the condition to occur, giving us more time to change our lifestyle habits and diet before any permanent consequences set in.
Key Takeaways: Can CBD Oil Help With Fatty Liver Disease?
The best way to prevent or treat fatty liver disease is through diet modification.
CBD and other cannabinoids are going to go a long way in slowing the progression of the disease, and may even help to reverse it, but they aren’t going to work very well if the causes are still going on.
The primary cause of fatty liver disease is poor diet and lifestyle habits.
Heavy drinking, high junk food diets, and lack of exercise are the main causes of the condition. If they aren’t removed, the problem will persist and eventually get worse.
Combining CBD oil with diet changes – like eliminating processed and refined carbohydrates -, quitting alcohol or cigarette consumption, and spending at least 30 minutes per day on a mild-moderate level of exercise are going to go a long way in addressing the actual cause for the condition.